Publication Ethics

COPE Standards & Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The journal maintains COPE membership and adherence as a condition of its editorial operation. It does not tolerate data fabrication, falsification, duplicate or redundant submission, undisclosed conflicts of interest, or honorary and ghost authorship.

In addition to standard human-subjects ethical requirements, institutional ethical approval and documented community informed consent are mandatory for all human-subjects engagement. Evidence of community partnership or co-design — letters of collaboration, memoranda of understanding, or documented community advisory input — is required at submission as a condition specific to this journal's participatory standard.

Full disclosure of all funding sources, including government, non-governmental, and corporate community-program sponsors, is required from all authors. Allegations of misconduct, raised before or after publication, are investigated by the Editor-in-Chief in consultation with the relevant Section Editor, following COPE's published flowcharts, and may result in rejection, correction, or retraction, with notification to the corresponding author's institution where warranted.

COPE Adherence

Strict alignment with COPE guidelines and flowcharts for editorial integrity and misconduct handling.

Zero Tolerance Policy

Strict prohibition against data fabrication, falsification, duplicate submission, and ghost authorship.

Community Consent & Co-Design

Mandatory institutional IRB approval, community consent, and formal letters of collaboration/MoU.

Funding Transparency

Mandatory full disclosure of all financial support from government, NGO, or corporate sponsors.