Peer Review Process

Shield Icon

Double-Blind Peer Review

JADE: Journal of AI, Data & Engineering applies a strictly double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific integrity of every published manuscript. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to guarantee an objective and unbiased evaluation.

The Review Workflow

How a manuscript is processed from submission to final decision.

1
Screening

Initial Screening

All submitted manuscripts are initially screened by the Editorial Team to verify compliance with the journal's scope, author guidelines, and publication ethics.

2
Reviewers

Expert Evaluation

Manuscripts passing preliminary assessment are assigned to at least two independent reviewers to evaluate originality, rigor, and scientific contribution.

3
Decision

Final Decision

Based on reviewers' recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision to accept, request revisions, or reject the manuscript.

"JADE is committed to maintaining a fair, transparent, and timely peer review process while providing constructive feedback that helps authors improve the quality and impact of their research."