Denashurya Journal

Journal of Sustainable Bioeconomy and One Health

The Journal of Sustainable Bioeconomy and One Health (JSBOH) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to a single, tightly bounded object of scientific inquiry: the Bioeconomy-Health Nexus — the closed-loop system through which biological production, economic circulation, clinical health, and socio-digital infrastructure co-determine one another as interdependent mechanisms of a single adaptive system.

JSBOH does not exist to aggregate research from agriculture, medicine, economics, or information technology as separate disciplinary contributions. It exists to publish research that demonstrates how these domains function as mechanisms of one system — how a perturbation introduced in biological production propagates through economic circulation, registers as a measurable effect on clinical or population health, and is mediated, accelerated, or constrained by the digital and social infrastructure that connects them. The journal's editorial identity rests on this systemic boundary, not on subject-matter breadth. JSBOH is, by design, a narrow-aperture, high-rigor venue: authors submit because their work demonstrates a traceable mechanism-to-mechanism linkage, not because their topic is difficult to place elsewhere.

This positioning is deliberate and non-negotiable. It is the journal's primary safeguard against the drift toward generalist, low-selectivity publishing that characterizes predatory and quasi-predatory outlets, and it is the basis on which every editorial decision — desk review, peer review, and final disposition — is made.

JADE: Journal of AI, Data & Engineering

JADE: Journal of AI, Data & Engineering is a peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing original research, review articles, and case studies in the fields of artificial intelligence, data science, and computing engineering. The journal emphasizes verifiable scientific contributions, clear and reproducible methodologies, and relevance to technological advancement and real-world problem solving. JADE accepts manuscripts in both Indonesian and English, and welcomes academics, researchers, and practitioners from Indonesia and across the globe.

AgroSciTech: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

AgroSciTech: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture is an international, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal dedicated to disseminating cutting-edge and innovative research in agricultural science, technology, and sustainability. The journal serves as a vital bridge connecting laboratory discoveries, technological engineering, and practical, real-world applications among active, practicing farmers and agribusiness actors. Amid the challenges of global climate change and threats to food security, AgroSciTech specifically focuses on the transformation of conventional farming into smart, adaptive, and sustainable agricultural systems. We welcome empirical research articles and comprehensive conceptual reviews that highlight the integration of modern technology (smart farming), agroecosystem optimization, and the broad socio-economic dynamics of agribusiness including the critical role of the younger generation and real farmer behavior in safeguarding the future of food security.

The Synergy: Journal of Outcome-Based Community Engagement

The Synergy: Journal of Outcome-Based Community Engagement is a multidisciplinary international journal dedicated to publishing high-standard community service initiatives with a primary focus on agro-economic empowerment, health resilience, and social institutional innovation. Distinct from conventional community engagement journals, The Synergy strictly enforces an outcome-based framework, requiring every published manuscript to explicitly demonstrate baseline situational evaluations, measurable transformational impacts, and quality assurance strategies to ensure the independent sustainability of the programs by partner communities. Published quarterly with issues released in September, December, March, and June and employing a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review process alongside an Open Access policy, the journal aims to serve as a premier global reference for cross-disciplinary collaboration and impactful community empowerment benchmarking.

Journal of Future Learning Ecosystems

Journal of Future Learning Ecosystems (JFLE) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing high-quality and interdisciplinary research on the development, innovation, governance, and sustainability of future learning ecosystems. The journal provides a scholarly platform for researchers, educators, policymakers, educational leaders, instructional designers, and technology developers to explore how learning environments evolve in response to technological advancement, social transformation, cultural diversity, and emerging global challenges.

JFLE conceptualizes education as a dynamic and interconnected ecosystem in which pedagogy, learning resources, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, human development, culture, leadership, management, and policy collectively shape meaningful, inclusive, adaptive, and sustainable learning experiences. The journal welcomes original research articles, review articles, systematic literature reviews, bibliometric studies, conceptual papers, and short communications that contribute to advancing future-oriented learning ecosystems across diverse educational contexts.

RIAM: Journal of English, Multilingualism, and Communication

RIAM: Journal of English, Multilingualism, and Communication is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes rigorous scholarship on how English and multilingual communication are learned, used, negotiated, translated, represented, and technologically mediated across educational, professional, public, cultural, and digital settings.

The journal is designed to connect English language education, applied linguistics, discourse and communication studies, translation, language policy, and language technology through one central concern: how language shapes participation, access to knowledge, professional mobility, public communication, cultural exchange, and digital inclusion in multilingual societies.

RIAM welcomes original research articles, systematic and scoping reviews, meta-analyses, corpus-based studies, discourse analyses, translation studies, conceptual papers, methodological articles, and research notes. The journal particularly welcomes scholarship from multilingual, underrepresented, and rapidly transforming societies, including the Global South and comparable contexts, while remaining open to high-quality submissions from all regions.

Journal of Applied Sciences and Sustainable Systems

The Journal of Applied Sciences and Sustainable Systems (JASSS) publishes original research on the applied scientific, economic, technological, and social systems that determine sustainable development outcomes. The journal's editorial position is that food security, population health, digital transformation, and human capital formation are not separable disciplinary concerns but interdependent components of applied systems whose performance is measured by their interaction, not by their individual parts in isolation.

JASSS is organized around three thematic pillars agricultural and economic systems, health and clinical systems, and digital and human-capital systems that together constitute a coherent research program in sustainable systems science. Submissions are evaluated for the rigor of their methodology, the originality of their contribution, and, where a manuscript addresses more than one pillar, the strength of the systemic linkage it establishes between them. This structure is intended to give the journal both scope and discipline: broad enough to accommodate the multi-sector nature of sustainability research, and specific enough to maintain the editorial standards expected of an internationally indexed venue.

Medical Practice & Health Systems Journal

The modern patient does not encounter medicine. The modern patient encounters a system — a triage decision, a referral pathway, a formulary, a staffing roster, a bed-occupancy figure, a financing mechanism, a supply chain, a discharge protocol, and a governance committee — and it is through this system, and only through this system, that the diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge of the clinician is finally delivered, or finally fails to be delivered. This journal is founded on the recognition that the distance between what medicine knows and what patients receive is not, in the twenty-first century, principally a distance of scientific ignorance. It is a distance of organisation, of leadership, of financing, of measurement, and of risk.

For the better part of a century the medical literature has been organised as though clinical knowledge and the systems that carry it were separable concerns — the former the proper business of the physician-scientist, the latter delegated to administrators, ministries, and the grey literature. That separation has become untenable. The great outcome gaps of our era are, in the overwhelming majority, implementation gaps. Two hospitals with identical evidence, identical drugs, and identically credentialled staff produce materially different survival curves, and the difference is not located in the pharmacology. It is located in whether the sepsis bundle was reliably initiated within the hour; whether the antimicrobial stewardship committee held authority as well as opinion; whether the nutritional screening tool was applied at admission or filed unread; whether the surgical checklist was performed or merely signed; whether the pharmacist stood at the ward round or was consulted after the error; whether the near-miss was reported or buried; and whether the leadership of the institution had built a culture in which a first-year resident could stop a consultant's hand.

It is the founding conviction of this journal that clinical excellence cannot be achieved, sustained, or reproduced without robust healthcare management, systemic leadership, and disciplined risk mitigation. These are not the administrative periphery of medicine. They are the mechanism of medicine's action at scale — the transmission between the engine of clinical science and the wheels of patient outcome. A therapeutic advance that cannot be governed, financed, supplied, staffed, measured, and safely delivered is, in the only sense that matters to the patient, not yet an advance at all.

This conviction is not a rhetorical posture. It is the journal's editorial architecture. We publish the clinical investigation and the systems investigation in the same volume, under the same peer-review standard, and we require of each precisely what the other has traditionally been permitted to omit: of the clinical paper, an account of how its finding survives contact with a real institution; of the systems paper, an account of the patient outcome it moved. We hold, as policy, that a study of hospital financing that never reaches a clinical endpoint is incomplete, and that a randomised trial silent on deliverability is likewise incomplete. The journal exists at the seam where these two literatures have failed to meet, and it is staffed — deliberately, and without apology — by clinicians trained in management, by managers trained in risk, by pharmacists trained in economics, and by public health scientists trained in the politics of delivery. This is not a dilution of medical rigour. It is a fuller specification of it.

The journal accordingly invites original research, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cohort and registry analyses, pragmatic and cluster-randomised trials, quality-improvement studies, health-economic evaluations, implementation-science reports, diagnostic and prognostic accuracy studies, instructive case series, and rigorously argued editorials and perspectives, from physicians, dentists, pharmacists, nutritionists, health administrators, health economists, medical sociologists, and health-system scientists worldwide.

Journal of Community Innovation and Social Impact

Knowledge that remains within the laboratory, the seminar room, or the peer-reviewed abstract has not yet completed its scientific obligation. It is the founding premise of this journal that a finding — pharmacological, agronomic, pedagogical, technological, financial, or clinical — acquires its full scientific value only at the moment it is translated into a measurable improvement in the life of a defined community, and that this translation is itself a rigorous, method-bound, and publishable act of science, not an afterthought to it.

The twentieth-century academy organised its disciplines by the origin of a problem — a question was medical, or agricultural, or educational, or economic — and rewarded depth within that origin. The twenty-first-century community does not experience its problems this way. A village confronting stunting among its children is confronting, simultaneously, a nutritional deficit, an agricultural productivity constraint, a health-literacy gap, a household-economics problem, and a public-health-system failure, and no single-discipline intervention, however excellent, resolves it alone. The appropriate unit of scientific inquiry for such a problem is not the discipline. It is the community, and the appropriate method is not laboratory replication but structured, accountable engagement with the people who live the problem.

This journal is therefore organised not around a subject-matter boundary but around a methodological and evaluative discipline: Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) and its wider family, Participatory Action Research (PAR). These traditions share a non-negotiable commitment — that the community is a co-investigator in the research, not a passive research site — together with an evidentiary standard that distinguishes them sharply from casual outreach or service reporting: a defined baseline, a specified intervention, a measured post-intervention outcome, and an account of the capacity the community retains after the researchers leave. It is this last element — durable capacity building rather than one-off service delivery — that separates translational community science from charity, and it is the standard against which this journal adjudicates every submission, regardless of the discipline from which the intervention originates.

The journal accordingly welcomes knowledge-transfer and implementation research from any originating discipline — medicine, pharmacy, agriculture, nutrition, education, information technology, business, and the social sciences among them — on the singular condition that the manuscript reports a genuine community engagement, evaluated with appropriate rigor, in service of a defined and measurable contribution to sustainable development. The disciplinary origin of the intervention is, to this journal, a matter of technical detail. The presence of a rigorously evaluated community outcome is the entire test.

Healthcare & Hospital Management Review

Jurnal ini berfokus pada publikasi artikel ilmiah hasil penelitian, kajian teoritis, dan studi kasus di bidang manajemen dan administrasi rumah sakit serta organisasi pelayanan kesehatan. Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk menjadi wadah akademis bagi para peneliti, praktisi, akademisi, dan penentu kebijakan dalam meningkatkan mutu, efisiensi, dan efektivitas pengelolaan rumah sakit.

SALUS JURIS: Journal of Health Law & Bioethics

Salus Juris: Journal of Health Law & Bioethics adalah jurnal ilmiah peer-review yang berfokus pada kajian multidisipliner mengenai persinggungan antara hukum, etika, dan sistem kesehatan. Jurnal ini menerbitkan penelitian, kajian konseptual, dan studi kasus yang membahas aspek hukum, regulasi, tata kelola, etika, serta perlindungan hak dalam pelayanan kesehatan.

Ruang lingkup jurnal mencakup hukum dan regulasi kesehatan, administrasi dan tata kelola rumah sakit, bioetika dan etika klinis, hukum kefarmasian, malpraktik dan tanggung jawab hukum medis, hukum kesehatan masyarakat, hukum kesehatan digital, hukum asuransi dan jaminan kesehatan, manajemen risiko dan kepatuhan fasilitas kesehatan, serta hak pasien dan perlindungan konsumen kesehatan.

Salus Juris bertujuan menjadi wadah akademik bagi akademisi, peneliti, praktisi hukum, tenaga kesehatan, pengelola fasilitas kesehatan, dan pemangku kebijakan untuk mengembangkan kajian serta solusi berbasis bukti terhadap berbagai persoalan hukum dan etika dalam sistem kesehatan

Jurnal Nutri Pangan Kesehatan

Jurnal Nutrisi, Pangan dan Kesehatan (JNPK) merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang mempublikasikan hasil penelitian, kajian ilmiah, dan inovasi dalam bidang nutrisi, ilmu gizi, pangan, dan kesehatan. Jurnal ini berfokus pada pengembangan ilmu dan praktik berbasis bukti untuk mendukung peningkatan status gizi, kesehatan individu dan masyarakat, serta pemanfaatan pangan yang aman, bergizi, dan berkelanjutan.

Ruang lingkup JNPK meliputi gizi klinik, gizi masyarakat, gizi ibu dan anak, ilmu pangan dan gizi, keamanan dan mutu pangan, teknologi dan inovasi pangan, nutrisi dan penyakit tidak menular, pendidikan dan promosi gizi, pola makan dan perilaku konsumsi, pangan lokal dan berkelanjutan, gizi kelompok khusus, serta epidemiologi gizi dan kesehatan