| |
| |
Publication Ethics |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
About the Journal
The modern patient does not encounter medicine. The modern patient encounters a system — a triage decision, a referral pathway, a formulary, a staffing roster, a bed-occupancy figure, a financing mechanism, a supply chain, a discharge protocol, and a governance committee — and it is through this system, and only through this system, that the diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge of the clinician is finally delivered, or finally fails to be delivered. This journal is founded on the recognition that the distance between what medicine knows and what patients receive is not, in the twenty-first century, principally a distance of scientific ignorance. It is a distance of organisation, of leadership, of financing, of measurement, and of risk.
For the better part of a century the medical literature has been organised as though clinical knowledge and the systems that carry it were separable concerns — the former the proper business of the physician-scientist, the latter delegated to administrators, ministries, and the grey literature. That separation has become untenable. The great outcome gaps of our era are, in the overwhelming majority, implementation gaps. Two hospitals with identical evidence, identical drugs, and identically credentialled staff produce materially different survival curves, and the difference is not located in the pharmacology. It is located in whether the sepsis bundle was reliably initiated within the hour; whether the antimicrobial stewardship committee held authority as well as opinion; whether the nutritional screening tool was applied at admission or filed unread; whether the surgical checklist was performed or merely signed; whether the pharmacist stood at the ward round or was consulted after the error; whether the near-miss was reported or buried; and whether the leadership of the institution had built a culture in which a first-year resident could stop a consultant's hand.
It is the founding conviction of this journal that clinical excellence cannot be achieved, sustained, or reproduced without robust healthcare management, systemic leadership, and disciplined risk mitigation. These are not the administrative periphery of medicine. They are the mechanism of medicine's action at scale — the transmission between the engine of clinical science and the wheels of patient outcome. A therapeutic advance that cannot be governed, financed, supplied, staffed, measured, and safely delivered is, in the only sense that matters to the patient, not yet an advance at all.
This conviction is not a rhetorical posture. It is the journal's editorial architecture. We publish the clinical investigation and the systems investigation in the same volume, under the same peer-review standard, and we require of each precisely what the other has traditionally been permitted to omit: of the clinical paper, an account of how its finding survives contact with a real institution; of the systems paper, an account of the patient outcome it moved. We hold, as policy, that a study of hospital financing that never reaches a clinical endpoint is incomplete, and that a randomised trial silent on deliverability is likewise incomplete. The journal exists at the seam where these two literatures have failed to meet, and it is staffed — deliberately, and without apology — by clinicians trained in management, by managers trained in risk, by pharmacists trained in economics, and by public health scientists trained in the politics of delivery. This is not a dilution of medical rigour. It is a fuller specification of it.
The journal accordingly invites original research, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cohort and registry analyses, pragmatic and cluster-randomised trials, quality-improvement studies, health-economic evaluations, implementation-science reports, diagnostic and prognostic accuracy studies, instructive case series, and rigorously argued editorials and perspectives, from physicians, dentists, pharmacists, nutritionists, health administrators, health economists, medical sociologists, and health-system scientists worldwide.
Publication Ethics